KSU, Vollara Team
to Advance Ionization for Food Safety
Libraries Science News |
|
Keywords IONIZATION, FOOD SAFETY, OZONE, PATHOGENS
|
|
Description
Ionization appears to be a better way than ozone
to fight food-borne pathogens, Kansas State
University researchers say.
|
MANHATTAN, Kan. – Ozone was good, but adding
ionization appears to be better when it comes to getting
rid of foodborne pathogens.
And what is ionization? Jim Marsden of a Food Safety
Consortium research team at Kansas State University
likens a new process using ionization to a “miniature
sun” of ultraviolet energy interacting with oxygen and
drawing particles out of the air, thus producing an
antimicrobial effect.
“When Mount St. Helens went off, you had all these
particles floating around,” Marsden said. “The reason
they’re not still floating around is that ionization
from the sun caused them to fall out of the air.”
Marsden’s KSU team worked with Vollara
International, a Greeneville, Tenn.-based company, to
determine the potential use of its ionization generator
for food safety in processing plants. The researchers
wanted to find out its effectiveness in reducing several
pathogens including E. coli, Listeria monocytogenes and
Staphylococcus auerus.
With Vollara phasing out its straight ozone
generation system and shifting to ionization, it settled
on a more advanced system that was originally developed
by NASA to decontaminating spacecrafts during long
missions, Marsden explained. The new technology for food
safety goes beyond being merely ozone based. Its
components consist of an antimicrobial part that uses
oxidated gases such as peroxide and ozone and the
ionized part.
“Here we’re talking about oxidated gases that
basically fill the room with a somewhat aggressive
antimicrobial system – extremely safe and breathable,”
Marsden said. “The levels of ozone are very low in terms
of OSHA and FDA standards.”
The researchers used stainless steel surfaces to test
the system’s effectiveness in removing contaminating
bacteria. The ionization system removed more microbial
populations than ozone at shorter exposure times.
Ozone already has a good track record as a
disinfectant. The FDA in 2001 approved its use as a
sanitizer for food contact surfaces and for direct
application to food products. It is also used
extensively for purification of bottled and municipal
water.
“In the meat and poultry industry there are some
applications for ozone where products are being treated
with aqueous ozone prior to being sliced,” Marsden said.
“They’re looking at ozone for decontamination of poultry
chillers and for direct decontamination of birds as they
go down the processing line.”
Marsden noted that the five years since government
approval of the process is not a long time to determine
how well applications are going to work, particularly in
the meat and poultry industry.
The ionization system may be suited for related uses
pending further research. KSU and Vollara personnel
will examine its effectiveness in inactivating avian
influenza environmentally. They may also investigate how
the system could control Listeria in ready-to-eat meat
processing environments.
The recent research results showed that ionization
was effective in reducing levels of Staphylococcus
auerus, leading researchers to consider the implications
for hospitals and nursing homes.
“The ionization effect is that it eliminated odors,”
Marsden explained. “For odors to be present they have to
be aeromatic, so if you take it out in particle form and
inactivate further with peroxide and ozone, it might
have some application as well in hospitals, nursing
homes and the food industry.”
|